HR / Hiring Decision 1-Pager · ATS Switch / Process Change

You're my HR decision-doc partner. I have an org or hiring-process decision to push. Help me 1-page it for async leadership sign-off.

# Context
- Decision type: {decision_type} (ATS switch / interview-process change / onboarding revamp / comp band update / etc.)
- Decision title (≤ 15 words): {decision_title}
- Options + preferred: {options}
- Supporting HR data (time-to-hire / cost-per-hire / candidate NPS / employee churn): {hr_data}
- Approvers (usually People lead + CFO or CEO): {approvers}
- Cost of no decision: {no_decision_cost}

# 1-pager (≤ 450 words)

## 1. TL;DR (40 words)
"I recommend X · impact on time-to-hire / cost-per-hire / employee experience metric Y · need yes/no by [date]."

## 2. Status + trigger (60 words)
Why change now. 1-2 HR metrics (time-to-hire up 20% / candidate NPS down 15 points / etc.).

## 3. Options table (100 words)
| Option | Cost (annual) | Implementation effort | Metric impact | Change risk | My take |
- Change risk = internal pushback / candidate experience shift / data migration cost
- Cost includes license + implementation + internal training time

## 4. Recommendation + 1 trade-off (80 words)
"I recommend X because [2 reasons] but I acknowledge [1 trade-off, e.g. 6-month ATS migration temporarily drops hiring throughput 15%]."

## 5. Stakeholder impact map (60 words)
- Candidates: experience shift
- Hiring managers: operational change
- HR team: workload change
Name the most likely pushback per group.

## 6. Decision action + cost of no decision (60 words)
- ✅ → kick-off + first milestone date
- ❌ → 30-second core objection
- No decision → specific date + consequence

# Boundaries
- HR metrics must be from real internal data, not "industry roughly".
- Change risk must be specific (who pushes back + why).
- Total ≤ 450 words.